10FastFingers Alternatives for Longer Typing Tests
By Mark Fulton · · Last verified

10FastFingers is a good site for one job: a quick 60 second test on common words, in a lot of languages, with competitions on top. You look for an alternative when you need a different job done. If you want longer tests, use a site with 3, 5 or 10 minute durations, such as TypeTimer or Monkeytype. If you want real sentences instead of a list of common words, pick a passage-based test. If you want a result an employer can check, you need a test with a public verification ID. And if you leave for any of these, expect your number to drop a little. That is not you getting slower. It is the test getting harder.
The rest of this page works through each reason, credits what 10FastFingers does well, and ends with a switch-or-stay table so you can decide in a minute.
What does 10FastFingers do well?
Start with the credit, because it is earned. On the 10FastFingers homepage, the main typing test is described as a 60 second game using the top 200 words of each language, and the site says it is available in over 40 languages. Strengths worth naming:
- It is fast. Sixty seconds, no setup. You can test, retry and test again in five minutes.
- It covers a lot of languages. If you need to measure typing in Spanish, German or Turkish, plenty of English-first tools fall short here. Check the language you need on the site, since the page itself gives different counts in different places (over 40 for the typing test, 54 for multiplayer).
- It is social. The site lists public and private competitions, plus a multiplayer mode. Its multiplayer page says up to 20 players race live, everyone gets the same 75 words, and English Quick Join races draw from the top 200 words list.
- It has a custom mode and text practice. The homepage says you can build your own test with your own duration and words, and type text of your own choosing.
- It tracks progress. Accounts earn points and levels, and the profile page is a personal dashboard with goals and records.
If your goal is a quick benchmark, a bit of competition, or a test in another language, you may not need an alternative at all. The rest of this page is for people whose goal has changed.
Why do people outgrow 10FastFingers?
The reasons are consistent, and none of them are bugs. They are design choices that stop fitting.
1. You want a longer test. The headline test is 60 seconds. A minute is a sprint, and the number reflects your best burst. For a number you can repeat, you want 3 to 5 minutes. We explain why in 1 vs 5 minute typing tests.
2. You want real passages. A test built from the top 200 or top 1000 most common words is mostly short, easy words you have typed ten thousand times. Work does not look like that. Emails have names, commas, capitals and numbers. A list of common words removes almost all of it.
3. You want your score to mean something to someone else. The pages I read for this article do not mention a certificate for 10FastFingers, so if you need a document, you will look elsewhere. Even where one exists, ask whether the recipient can verify it.
4. You want detail about your mistakes. A WPM and accuracy figure tells you how you did, but not why. If you want to see which keys slow you down, a training tool such as Keybr is a better fit than a test.
5. You want fewer distractions. Rival sites describe 10FastFingers as ad-supported. I could not confirm that from 10FastFingers' own page, so check how you feel about it yourself. If ads bother you, several alternatives below do not run them.
If you are not yet a touch typist, none of these matter much. Learn the keys first with finger placement and the home row. Testing measures a skill you have. It does not build it.
Which alternatives offer longer tests?
Here is the short list, with what each one actually offers.
- TypeTimer has labeled duration buttons for 30 seconds, 1, 3, 5 and 10 minutes, plus an untimed stopwatch mode. It has dedicated pages for the 3-minute test, the 5-minute test and the 10-minute test. No account is needed. (We make it, so weigh this entry accordingly.)
- Monkeytype is the most configurable. Its README describes it as a minimalistic and customizable typing test with a variety of test lengths and languages, many modes, and an account system for saving history. It is open source under the GPL-3.0 license.
- KeySprint says on its own blog that it offers 1 minute and 5 minute tests among other durations, sentence-style practice, specialty tests and an optional downloadable certificate. I only read its marketing page, so treat that as its description and not a verified review.
For a deeper side by side with Monkeytype, TypingTest.com and others, see Monkeytype alternatives compared.
Which alternatives use real passages instead of word lists?
This is the change that matters most for your score, and the one people forget to ask about.
A word-list test gives you a stream of the most common words in random order. A passage test gives you sentences with capitals, punctuation and the occasional long word. TypeTimer's default text source is original sentences written for the test, with a toggle for common-words mode if you want to compare. The custom typing test goes further and lets you paste your own text, which is the closest you can get to practicing for a particular job.
Two reasons to prefer passages:
- They match the work. If you are heading toward a data entry, admin or support role, you will be typing names and punctuation, not a random sample of the 200 commonest words.
- They are harder to game. Common words become muscle memory. Sentences do not repeat the same way.
You can still use a word-list test as a warm-up or a burst-speed check. Just do not put its result on a job application.
Will your score drop when you switch?
Almost certainly yes, and it is worth understanding before it gets in your head. Three things change at once when you leave a 60 second word test for a longer passage test:
- The text gets harder. Capitals and punctuation cost keystrokes. Rare words cost hesitation.
- The time gets longer. Over several minutes, you cannot sprint. Fatigue and rhythm show up.
- The scoring may differ. Some sites report raw speed, others subtract errors. Check whether the number you see is net or gross. Our guide to how WPM is calculated shows the difference.
I will not give you a percentage, because it varies by person and I have no source to cite for an average. The pattern, though, is reliable: a one-minute word score reads highest, and a longer passage score reads lower. The reasons are all covered in why your WPM differs on every typing test.
A practical way to find your own gap:
- Take the 10FastFingers 60 second test and note the score.
- Take a 1 minute passage test and note it.
- Take a 5 minute passage test and note it.
The distance between the first and last number is your word-list premium. Once you know it, you will stop panicking when different sites disagree.
Should you switch or stay? A decision table
| Why you are leaving | Best fit | What you give up |
|---|---|---|
| You want 3, 5 or 10 minute tests | TypeTimer or Monkeytype | The 10FastFingers language range and its competition culture |
| You want real sentences, not common words | TypeTimer, TypingTest.com or Monkeytype in quote mode | Fast, easy words that read higher |
| You want maximum configuration | Monkeytype | Simplicity, since there are more options than you may want |
| You need proof for an employer | A test with a public verification ID, such as TypeTimer's $4.99 certificate | Free, with no purchase |
| You want to improve rather than measure | Keybr or TypeQuicker | A pure timed test |
| You want live races | Stay on 10FastFingers multiplayer, or try TypeRacer | Nothing, because you did not need to leave |
| You want tests in other languages | Stay on 10FastFingers | Nothing |
Read the last two rows twice. Sometimes the right answer is to stay.
What about proof of your speed?
If a hiring manager asks for evidence, a screenshot is weak. Anyone can edit one. A stronger result has a unique ID that the reader can type into a public lookup to confirm the name, speed, accuracy and date. TypeTimer's verified certificate works this way: the test and the shareable result card are free, the certificate is a one-time $4.99, and anyone can check the ID at /verify. The limits are plain: the test is self-administered, and a proctored or in-person requirement will not accept an online certificate from us or from anyone else. Our guide on whether employers verify typing speed covers what to check first.
Ready to see your own gap? Compare your 10FastFingers score with a 5-minute passage test, free and with no account.
Frequently asked questions
Is 10FastFingers accurate? It is accurate for what it measures: how fast you type the most common words of a language over a short time. Its own homepage describes the main test as 60 seconds on the top 200 words. That makes it a consistent benchmark, but not a measure of how you type everyday writing. For a speed you can quote, run a 3 to 5 minute passage test and report that.
Why is my 10FastFingers WPM higher than on other sites? Short, common words are easy to type, and a 60 second test lets you sprint. Passage tests add capitals, punctuation and longer words, and longer durations add fatigue. Some sites also subtract errors from the score. Compare numbers only within the same kind of test. The full explanation is in why your WPM differs on every typing test.
Is there a 10FastFingers alternative with a certificate? Yes, more than one. KeySprint's blog says it offers a downloadable PDF certificate. TypeTimer sells a verified certificate for a one-time $4.99, with a public lookup page at /verify so the reader can confirm it. Whichever you pick, ask whether the recipient can check it, and whether the employer accepts an online certificate at all.
Does 10FastFingers support other languages? Yes. Its homepage says the typing test is available in over 40 languages, and its multiplayer page says races run in 54. The page counts differ, so check the specific language you need on the site. If that is your reason for using it, that is a good reason to stay.